Saturday, February 18, 2012

Jeremy Lin's hopes and hoops


Jeremy Lin has said he struggles to play for God, not himself. -- PHOTO: REUTERS
Published on Feb 19, 2012



By David Brooks

Jeremy Lin is anomalous in all sorts of ways. He's a Harvard grad in the NBA, an Asian-American man in professional sports. But we shouldn't neglect the biggest anomaly. He's a religious person in professional sports.


We've become accustomed to the faith-driven athlete and coach, from Billy Sunday to Tim Tebow. But we shouldn't forget how problematic this is. The moral ethos of sport is in tension with the moral ethos of faith, whether Jewish, Christian or Muslim.


The moral universe of modern sport is oriented around victory and supremacy. The sports hero tries to perform great deeds in order to win glory and fame. It doesn't really matter whether he has good intentions. His job is to beat his opponents and avoid the oblivion that goes with defeat.


The modern sports hero is competitive and ambitious. (Let's say he's a man, though these traits apply to female athletes as well.) He is theatrical. He puts himself on display.


He is assertive, proud and intimidating. He makes himself the centre of attention when the game is on the line. His identity is built around his prowess. His achievement is measured by how much he can elicit the admiration of other people - the roar of the crowd and the respect of ESPN (Entertainment and Sports Programming Network).


His primary virtue is courage - the ability to withstand pain, remain calm under pressure and rise from nowhere to topple the greats.


This is what we go to sporting events to see. This sporting ethos pervades modern life and shapes how we think about business, academic and political competition.


But there's no use denying - though many do deny it - that this ethos violates the religious ethos on many levels. The religious ethos is about redemption, self-abnegation and surrender to God.


Ascent in the sports universe is a straight shot. You set your goal and you climb towards greatness. But ascent in the religious universe often proceeds by a series of inversions: You have to be willing to lose yourself in order to find yourself; to gain everything you have to be willing to give up everything; the last shall be first; it's not about you.


For many religious teachers, humility is the primary virtue. You achieve loftiness of spirit by performing the most menial services. (That's why shepherds are perpetually becoming kings in the Bible.) You achieve your identity through self- effacement.


You achieve strength by acknowledging your weaknesses. You lead most boldly when you consider yourself an instrument of a larger cause.


The most perceptive athletes have always tried to wrestle with this conflict. Sports history is littered with odd quotations from people who try to reconcile their love of sport with their religious creed - and fail.


Jeremy Lin has wrestled with this tension quite openly. In a 2010 interview with the website Patheos, he recalled: 'I wanted to do well for myself and my team. How can I possibly give that up and play selflessly for God?'


Lin says in that interview that he has learnt not to obsess about stats and championships. He continues: 'I'm not working hard and practising day in and day out so that I can please other people. My audience is God... The right way to play is not for others and not for myself, but for God. I still don't fully understand what that means; I struggle with these things every game, every day. I'm still learning to be selfless and submit myself to God and give up my game to Him.'


The odds are that Lin will never figure it out because the two moral universes are not reconcilable. Our best teacher on these matters is Joseph Soloveitchik, the great Jewish theologian. In his essays 'The Lonely Man of Faith' and 'Majesty and Humility', he argues that people have two natures. First, there is 'Adam the First', the part of us that creates, discovers, competes and is involved in building the world. Then, there is 'Adam the Second', the spiritual individual who is awed and humbled by the universe as a spectator and a worshipper.


Soloveitchik plays off the text that humans are products of God's breath and the dust of the earth, and these two natures have different moral qualities, which he calls the morality of majesty and the morality of humility. They exist in creative tension with each other and the religious person shuttles between them, feeling lonely and slightly out of place in both experiences.


Jeremy Lin is now living this creative contradiction. Much of the anger that arises when religion mixes with sport or with politics comes from people who want to deny that this contradiction exists and who want to live in a world in which there is only one morality, one set of qualities and where everything is easy, untragic and clean. Life and religion are more complicated than that.


New York Times

Significance of "40 days"

The Catechism of the Catholic Church says that during Lent's 40 days. "the Church unites herself each year to the mystery of Jesus in the desert" (No. 504)

How so?

In God's mysterious ways, it seems to me, biblical deserts can be places of trouble and temptation but a journey towards new notheless proceeds in them.

The account of Jesus' 40 desert days reminded the early Christians of the Exodus and the 40 years their Israelite ancestors wandered in the desert, tempted at times to worship idols.

In the end, though, God led the Israelites to the Promised Land and to new life.

As such, Jesus' public mission, marked at its start by desert encounters with Satan, proceeded towards the life-giving events of Easter.

After All The Feasting, Let's Eat Simply

By Anne Lim,

After feasting (from Christmas to CNY), we who have been so blessed must need now to give our bodies a rest! For the sake of our health, for the sake of our planet.

Research has shown that as adults, we do not need so much protein unless we return to hunting for our meat as our ancestors did. Excess protein consumption has also been linked to cancer and many degenerative diseases.

The food not only nourishes and gives us pleasure, it connects us with the Earth. We are fed by the produce of soil, water, air, all of which make up the larger environment, our greater community.

Before this food that we choose to eat reaches our table, it would have gone through processes which involve planting, harvesting, rearing, packaging, storage, transportation, etc. - all of which require energy as well as waste disposal.

Since we can get fresh fruits and vegetables of all kinds all year round, we do not have a clear sense of the value of nature's gifts to us.

If we truly value the connection we have with Mother Earth through these gifts, we would accept without hesitation our responsibility as caretakers of the Earth. WE would pray pray hard for the grace of gratitude each time we sit down to eat.

Are we willing to make a conscious choice to make a change in some of our eating habits and to give up some of the conveniences of life that we have become so attached to?

How about reducing the need for plastic and polystyrene disposables and switching to the good old tiffin carrier for takeaways?

With the approach of Lent, it would help us to rein in that appetite for rich foood. Let us then respond with a return to simplicity. The good news is that what is good for the planet is also good for our health.

So can we live simply so that others may simply live? Each day is a new day. To live more lightly, let's eat less meat, waste not, eat more fruit and vegetables and avoid or eat less processed foods.